Feeds:
Posts
Comments

Missions Mentoring

After a recent speaking engagement, an attendee inquired about the “generational changing of the guard,” which is the premise for the The Meeting of the Waters.  He wondered if I am enthusiastic about “Apple Guy” leading the global church into the future.  He questioned whether global missions leaders should simply go along with all new trends, or whether we should preserve some tried and true ways of doing missions, for at least a while longer.

I am quick to admit that I have concerns about this transition period. So many young people embarking on missions, today, have short-term orientations. They don’t foresee being “in the field” for more than a couple of years. They haven’t devoted extensive years to training for their missions life. They haven’t necessarily “signed up” for the difficult, uncomfortable, sacrificial lifestyles required in so many mission assignments.  And then, after gaining wisdom and expertise in their foreign setting, many of them return home after a short, two-three, year stint. By contrast, “Mission Marm’s” burning zeal for the lost, her willingness to do whatever it took and to serve the lost in other countries, and her commitment of her entire life to serving God in the missions context–those things will all be sorely missed.

But the future world will require missionaries to be more adaptable and connected than Mission Marm was.  And the change has already begun: studies show that American churches’ support of career missionaries is markedly decreasing.    The younger, shorter-term mission workers are the new normal.  The good news is that, I have found that the Apple Guy generation is open and eager for inter-generational relationships and guidance. More experienced Christians should take it as a personal challenge and commitment to mentor younger believers in missions and other spiritual matters.  This will help them gain knowledge and wisdom, and also serve as their entree into the workings and leadership of the global church.

This blog was originally posted by ParadoxUganda: http://paradoxuganda.blogspot.com/2011/12/caught-in-turbulence.html

Scott brought back from his meetings a thought provoking book called The Meeting of The Waters, 7 Global Currents that will Propel the Future Church, by Fritz Kling. In the introductory chapter he describes two classic missionaries meeting at a guest house, two contrasting models of missions. The first is an older lady who has spent her entire life with a remote people group, rarely traveled back to America, had given up everything. We honored two couples and two single women who were just like that this past week at the AIM conference. They were retiring after 30 to 43 years of service in Africa. They had pioneered remote stations, translated books into local languages, established schools, weathered wars. They bore up under whatever life brought their way with very little outside help. They were grey-haired sturdy survivors with practical shoes, quiet and unassuming, faithful servants for the duration. One had come here as a little girl in 1946, a trip which took two months on a boat in those days. After a few years in Tanzania her parents left due to health reasons, but she returned as a young woman in 1968, was married in the RVA chapel, and the rest is history. These are the heroes that drew my heart towards Africa as a girl. They are the generation that laid down their lives and did the right thing, year after year, without fanfare. I didn’t even know any of these people, but the standing ovations at their retirement brought tears to my eyes.

The second missionary in Kling’s introductory chapter is a 30-something guy who is multitasking on his cell phone and computer, has left his family in America while he checks out a project run by local leaders that his church supports. He has a career, but is arranging to take two years to spend overseas lending his skills. This is the new generation of missionaries. The break with their formal life is less abrupt, more fluid. They set boundaries and have high expectations of personal development, exercise, protected family time, organizational support and responsibility. Travel and communication lend connectivity, educational levels are high, they are task-oriented generally, outcome-focused, and missions is an important part of their life, but not their whole life. We meet amazing people like this here too. Skilled doctors donating a month, or six, or more to boost services and education. Teachers, engineers, artists, contractors. People with the funds and vision to start and orphanage or foster micro-enterprise, who will leave it within a few years in local hands.

As I finished the introduction and started into the book (I’m only a third of the way through) I had sort of an “aha” moment. When the two rivers flow together to create the Amazon, there is a stretch where their waters flow in parallel, then a period of mixing and turbulence. And we are squarely in that turbulence. With 18 years in Africa behind us, we are a bit past the half-way mark towards the classic old-time missionary life. This is who we expected to be. And this is why over a year out from Bundibugyo, I have to keep remembering the very specific ways God led us, and convincing myself it is right to be here at Kijabe. On the other hand, we carry iphones and text our son in America, we travel, we access grant funding for projects, we connect with the national health system. We’re now working at a hospital that was founded upon the classic missionary model, but is largely staffed by more modern types. When I look at the December call schedule, we are 2 of about 5 missionary doctors with more than a decade behind us, the rest of the 30-some names on there are either short-termers or young Kenyans.

So we’re in an in-between generation, uncomfortable not living up to the heroes of the past generation, but not really fully able to buy into the ethos of the new generation either. I guess that’s OK, to be Hebrews 11 pilgrims and strangers. Being securely settled in one group is not our goal. I hope we can be part of the melding, the settling out of the streams to honor what is best in both. Combining longevity with innovation, relationship with technology, perseverance with enabling nationals. Maybe because we’re spending our first Christmas in this new place, it’s a good time to reflect.

For many years, one of the Christian preachers whom I’ve heard referenced consistently has been John Piper.  Piper is known for his disciplined and clear articulation of Biblical orthodoxy.  He is also a devotee of Twitter.  He said he views Twitter as a “rigorous, yet creative chance to pursue mastery of written expression, and concise-yet-complete theology.”   “Tweeting,” he wrote, “is to preaching what the book of Proverbs is to the book of Romans.”

As a Twitter fan, I know that it’s much easier to tweet about superficial, passing topics like sports, news, celebrities, or daily events — than deeply grounded theology.  My hat is off to Dr. Piper.

I was doubly intrigued, then, when I read Dr. Piper’s tweeted answer to popular singer/songwriter John Mayer. http://www.desiringgod.org/blog/posts/how-do-i-think-about-tweeting-a-response-to-john-mayer.  The Berklee-trained Mayer is a guitar savant, and also a free-living guy with graphic opinions and a large following.  He’s also been leading tweeter…until he stopped because tweeting had become an addiction and obsession which undermined his songwriting ability.

In The Meeting of the Waters, I suggested that technology is one of the seven global currents to which the global church must adapt.  Piper knows the importance of social media in today’s world, suggesting that Mayer and others shouldn’t dismiss it, but should reclaim it as one more tool for proclaiming truth.  He calls Twitter “ a fruitfully demanding form,” saying ,”I love words. I rarely think of them as efficient, but as precious. God made them to carry the freight of truth and beauty. Nothing is more valuable than God’s truth and beauty.”

One of the most arresting images in the aftermath of the World Trade Center attacks in 2001 was a group of rescue workers gathered around two beams from One World Trade Center tower, which formed a cross. During that time of fear, doubt, and confusion, the reassuring Christian image brought comfort to many.  Now, though, we learn that that same cross causes offense, revulsion, and even physical nausea! So much so that atheists are actually sueing to keep that 20-foot-high cross out of a 9/11 museum at Ground Zero.

In the chapter on Mediation in The Meeting of the Waters, I predict that we Christians and those who oppose the message of Christ will increasingly find ourselves on opposite sides of issues, hurling accusations and invectives at the each other. For me, it continually begs the question: Where would Jesus line up in these debates? On one hand, we see an angry Jesus casting out the moneychangers from the temple, where they were blaspheming his Father’s house. On the other, we see compassionate Jesus meeting the “women at the well,” more than half way, on her turf.  There, I marvel at His incisive moral teaching, His spiritual authority, and His humility.

As Christians seek to speak for Truth and also demonstrate love in this increasingly polarized world, where should we line up? While answers to this question are elusive, I am convinced of two things.  First, instances where my Christian views will be met with strong opposition and hostility are going to increase in number and intensity.  And also, Christians’ principled stances will be needed more than ever, in a future world characterized by polarization.  I believe we need to learn to practice what Dr. Richard Mouw calls ”convicted civility” in his wonderful book, Uncommon Decency.  I agree with Muow when he writes that “Cultivating civility can make strong Christian convictions even stronger.”

A pastor friend recently commented on the important role of teaching in today’s churches, as opposed to preaching.  He observed that most churches offer precious few opportunities for pastors to teach.  We proceeded to discuss the future role, if any, of Sunday Schools in American churches.

An hour later, I was speaking via Skype to a group of pastors in Texas, and one asked me where I would direct tens of thousand of dollars, if I could choose any project at all. I told him that many granters and I regard leadership development as the very most important need in the global Church.  As a donor and philanthropic advisor, I don’t know of any projects which are more scalable and strategic than leadership development.

Buildings can be demolished or seized by hostile governments. Programs can be defunded by donors.  Leaders, though, cannot be quelled, as they apply their gifting toward the world’s greatest needs.  This is true even in highly educated countries like the United States, where increasingly there is inadequate theological and Biblical grounding.  It is true in nations with emerging economies, like India, China, Vietnam, and Brazil.

It is also true in less-developed nations around the world, which are now finally producing indigenous leaders to fill the roles that missionaries and outsiders used to fill.  In a future of Mutual mission collaboration, outsiders from the west will need to pair with (or follow) indigenous leaders, who demonstrate new levels of education, experience, connectedness, and confidence.

In this month’s “Leaders Edge Book Summary” for The Missions Edge, David Mays wrote the following write up about “The Meeting of the Waters.”  They also posted a link to an audio clip extra where Fritz sat down for an informal half hour conversation discussing his thoughts on the 7 global currents.

Fritz Kling is a foundation executive who has spent the past decade traveling through villages and cities across the world interviewing grassroots workers and high-level leaders. The title metaphor comes from two large rivers that flow together side by side before mingling to become the mighty Amazon. Kling identifies seven huge trends impacting today’s global church. His fascinating stories illustrate the themes of mercy, mutuality, migration, monoculture, machines, mediation, and memory.

Chapter 4. Migration - A Taste of Heaven

Refugees and immigrants from the global south are bringing fresh fervor and devoutness, as well as opportunities for ministry, to Western countries.

Information arbitrage is looking at the world from many perspectives. Nick in Ireland said that every aspect of his ministry is influenced by Migration. Ministry is all about migration. It is the key issue of our day. We must learn the cultural assumptions and expectations people bring with them, and then use those as bridges to establish rapport. Immigrants are often open to church and faith. The church too often reacts to change rather than anticipates it. We need entrepreneurial, opportunistic outreach.

Migration is occurring everywhere on the globe. Urbanization is one of its most profound expressions. Today’s world-cities obliterate the old distinction between home and foreign missions. A redemptive view of the city sees vibrant opportunity, innovation, and new expressions of Christianity.

“With our brothers and sisters from developing nations, their outward appearances of poverty and subservience can hide deep reserves of spiritual, intellectual, and cultural wealth. Viewing people without money or power as equals is not only the right choice – it is becoming the only choice. … Mutuality may be the single most important Current for understanding how to support, work with, and pray for Christian movements around the world.” (65-66)

“Believers from poorer nations understand humility before God and dependency on God in a deeper way than I could, largely because they have lived in countries where physical deprivation and humiliating dependency are commonplace.” (66)

“If you really want to understand the future of Christianity, go and see what is happening in Asia, Africa, Latin America…. God very often is working most powerfully far from the center.” (73)

“One of the problems in modern life…is that the people who are good at being civil often lack strong convictions and people who have strong convictions often lack civility.” (quoting Martin Marty) “We need to find a way of combining a civil outlook with a ‘passionate intensity’ about our convictions. The real challenge is to come up with a convicted civility.” (quoting Richard Mouw) “Followers of Christ must step into the void between factions – sometimes as prophets, expecting condemnation, but more often as peacemakers, encouragers, and friends.” (164-165)

“On May 18, 1980, in Skamania County, Washington – eight years after Nike was founded just seventy miles away – Mount St. Helens erupted. Wind-borne volcanic ash dusted the sidewalks, penthouses, public plazas, and lawns throughout the Pacific Northwest of the United States. Fifty miles from Mount St. Helens, ash piled two inches deep. Winds carried trace amounts of the ash literally around the world.

A volcanic eruption is a perfect metaphor for how Monoculture came to be. Like volcanoes, companies push ideas and images throughout the world to customers thousands of miles from the source.

Once Monculture arrives in town, the place never looks the same. Fez will look a little less like Morocco, for instance, and more like Monoculture.” (112-113)

If you are harvesting this illustration for future consideration, file it under monoculture, or global culture, or global youth culture.

In societies around the world, differences are being emphasized, arousing suspicions. Indignities are exaggerated, prompting extreme actions. Moderation is disdained. The global church must step into mediation. Mediation is needed in many areas: political, philosophical, social, ethnic, international, mission, class, economic, and religious. Every Christ follower can be involved in reconciliation with people with different beliefs, customs, and ethnic backgrounds. The church must proclaim Jesus with theological integrity, critical contextualization, and with an open and transparent spirit.

Different generations are used by God to serve the world in different ways at different times. Today’s Christians need to be highly adaptable and relevant as well as orthodox. These will be hallmarks of the global church’s next generation.

David’s Recommendation:

Many in the older generation are highly concerned about conserving orthodox theology and historical mission methods. Many in the younger generation have Christian commitments in a much broader arena, such as poverty, human rights, ecology, justice, conflict, equality, reconciliation, and global events. The author suggests we must bundle the past passion for evangelizing with many other approaches to societal change.

What is your perspective on this question? Is your organization focused on either “spiritual change,” or “societal change,” or both? Is it changing? What is the balance in your organization between maintaining commitment to your theology, history, and values on the one hand, and becoming more adaptable and relevant? Is your organization unified on your approach? Are there fault lines in your organization between office and field? Among generations? Elsewhere?

What steps do you think your leadership could take to be both biblical and relevant, to accommodate your elder leaders and your young generation members, to satisfy your supportive constituency and make new inroads in a rapidly changing world?

Your kid is an addict.  Those are hard words to hear, but Christian parents need to hear the truth.  Proof lies in a recent study of 1,000 university students in 10 countries, which interviewed 17-23-year old students on the effect of technology in their lives.

The students’ responses are chilling.  They reported that they experienced mental and physical distress, anxiety attacks, depression, and confusion when forced to unplug from technology for an entire day.  They found that they were unable to voluntarily avoid their gadgets for a full day.  They all, regardless of nationality, admitted to being addicted to mobile phones, laptops, television, and social networking.

The students used virtually the same words to describe their reactions: fretful, irritable, insecure, nervous, restless, crazy, panicked, jealous, lonely, jittery and paranoid. Note, though, that they were not cut off from all contact: while they were required to give up mobile devices, they were permitted to use landline telephones and read books.

In all, only 21% of them said they experienced any benefits from being unplugged.  Those reported that they got into conversations which were different in terms of quality and depth.

Jesus said that He came for us to have life and to have it abundantly.  Humans were designed to be in relation with one another, just as the Father, Son and Holy Spirit are in fellowship with each other. When anything –like mobile devices — get in the way of full and deep relationships, Christians should be there to build bridges and create relational fabric.  This is the task of fostering “shalom” where we live — praying for and promoting our communities’ and friends’ wellbeing.

Short-term mission trips are all the rage– whether secular or religious, domestic or international, several days or several months.  The trippers range from middle schoolers to college students.  It’s no wonder that today’s younger generations are so attuned to global justice and mercy, since watched epidemics, tsunamis, cyclones, earthquakes, bombings, and revolutions played out every night on their TV screens.

Christians, too, are increasingly eager to serve others in distant places — to travel there and be Christ’s arms and legs.  This is mostly a positive trend…but there are also some downsides.

There are many articles about how STMs perpetuate western imperialism, and I think many of them are unfair or overblown. But I’ll list just a few of the more obvious negatives: free labor or products can eliminate jobs that would provide living wages for local workers;  free labor can create (or perpetuate) local dependency on outside support;  and, the artificial, rushed foreigner-local relationships fostered by STMs can perpetuate longstanding, negative stereotypes.

I suggest three simple alignment questions for short-term mission trippers — questions which might help bridge the visitors’ attitudes and methods with the locals’ expectations and needs.

1.  Assume that your STM team is not the first to visit that community.  This assumption prompts visitors to be sensitive to hosts’ past experiences and memories.  In most cases, locals have already been thoroughly exposed to western brands and values.    In some cases, you’ll be following in the steps of much-loved Christians who preceded you…and some times you’ll be following Christians who were culturally insensitive or even despised.  And, the locals will rarely be frank with you about these issues.

2. Remember that you’re providing services and teaching which they can also get from other sources.  This reminder helps visitors to remain realistic about what they attempt, and humble about their impact.  Rarely do STM trips go to places completely unreached by the Gospel, so visitors are often building upon a foundation laid by others.   By God’s grace, your team’s words or deeds may indeed be used to foster conversions or even revival… or you may simply be advancing the cause for others to complete.

3.  Assume that you or your team will be back.  This assumption frees your team from pushing its agenda too hard, and reminds you to be sensitive to the locals’ receptivity.  It is a good reminder for visitors to focus on relationships and not try to force results.

I’m a fan of STMs.  That is why I hope these simple attitude-checks will help to foster richer ministry and better experiences, both for the visiting team and also the locals.

France is famous for its policy of “laicite” — a policy of strict secularism and no governmental involvement in religion.  Under laicite, the French view religion  the same way my 4 siblings viewed their little brother Fritz: naive, under-evolved, cute-but-not-useful, and best ignored.   England, with its state religion, is not much better.  There, as in other countries with state churches,  many people are effectively inoculated against faith; sadly, they’ve been only exposed to the institutional church, and never to the living Jesus Christ.

In the United Kingdom, there’s also another layer of complexity– a burgeoning Muslim population.  The government is dead set on avoiding conflict and unrest, and its strategy seems to be to suppress religious freedom for Christians.  How else to interpret these events?

  • In 2008, a Christian check-in worker at Heathrow Airport was denied the right to wear a tiny cross on a chain.
  • Last year, a couple was denied the right to take in foster children– as they’d done 15 times since 1990 — because they wouldn’t teach the child that gay marriage is equal to traditional marriage.  The judge ruled that laws protecting gays against discrimination “should take precedence” over religious freedom.  Most chilling was the Human Rights Commission contention that children must be protected from “the infection of Christianity”–a statement it has subsequently withdrawn.
  • Last month, a private bed and breakfast was fined because the owners refused to allow a gay couple to rent a double bed.

Put simply, Christians in the increasingly pluralistic United Kingdom are losing their right to make choices based on conscience, if those choices are deemed to threaten societal harmony or sensibilities.  This is not simply a case of Christianity losing preeminence — it’s actually losing equal treatment.  UK seems to fashioning a muzzle specially fitted for Christians: in the Heathrow case, the Christian woman’s fellow employee was allowed to wear a Muslim headscarf.

This is alarming, even to a self-professed British atheist like historian David Starkey.  Regarding the government, Starkey criticized the kneejerk closed-mindedness which calls “a new tyranny.”  Regarding Christians, Starkey told BBC’s “Question Time” that the B&B owners should simply have posted “a quite proper notice in a small privately run hotel which says, ‘We are Christians and this is what we believe.”  In other words, in a future culture of increasing polarization, Christians must find newly generous, confident, and clear explanations of exactly what Jesus and we stand for.

One of the primary “carriers” of cultural and societal change is media.  Movies, television, magazines, and the internet spread values and ideals; whether originating in Mumbai, Hollywood, Paris, or Hong Kong, these ideas spread virally and create a global “Monoculture.”  As a result, communities and countries come to embrace fads and values which would have formerly been unthinkable.

Two Arizona State researchers recently confirmed that fat is now out — all around the world.   Obsession with thinness has long existed in the U.S., England, Australia, and other “Anglosphere” countries, but it has now spread to countries where plumper, larger bodies have traditionally been viewed as attractive.  In India, where portliness used to be associated with wealth, one woman now observed that “Fat equals lazy. Fat equals comedy relief.  I had a highly educated friend confess that she would prefer for her children to be anorexic rather than overweight.”

The lead Arizona State researcher suggested, “I think the next big question is whether it’s going to create a lot of new suffering where suffering didn’t exist before.”  And, that is where the global Church should come in.  As body issues such as objectification, comparison, self-image, addiction, and exploitation become pervasive in all countries, followers of Christ and churches must provide truth, comfort, and love.  Even in the face of “Monoculture creep,” Christian truths like human dignity, inner beauty, grace, and abundance will win the day.

Older Posts »

Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.